Two groups, thirty years apart, both from the west of Scotland, both usually described as the moment Scottish painting became modern. They get confused constantly. The difference is not subtle once you know what to look for.
The short version
The Glasgow Boys were the 1880s. They painted outdoors, in the countryside, in cold grey northern light, and their subject was ordinary rural work.
The Scottish Colourists were the 1910s and 1920s. They painted in the studio and on holiday, in hot French and Hebridean light, and their subject was colour itself.
If the picture is a farm labourer in a field under a flat sky, it is a Glasgow Boy. If it is a vase of roses on a white cloth that looks like it might set the table on fire, it is a Colourist.
Who was in each
Glasgow Boys — around twenty painters, no membership list. The core: James Guthrie, John Lavery, E. A. Hornel, George Henry, Joseph Crawhall, Arthur Melville, E. A. Walton.
Scottish Colourists — four, and they were only grouped together after most of them had died: S. J. Peploe, J. D. Fergusson, F. C. B. Cadell, G. L. Hunter.
There is no overlap in membership. There is one thread: both looked to France first and to Edinburgh second, and both were resented for it.
What each was rebelling against
The Glasgow Boys were arguing with the Royal Scottish Academy — brown, varnished, sentimental Highland scenes painted indoors from imagination. They called them gluepots. The answer was to go and stand in an actual field at Cockburnspath and paint what was there.
The Colourists were not arguing with anybody in particular. By 1910 the Glasgow Boys had already won that fight and several of them were knights. What the Colourists rejected was the tonal method itself: the idea that you build a picture out of light and dark and add colour afterwards. They made colour the structure.
How to tell them apart in ten seconds
| Glasgow Boys | Scottish Colourists | |
|---|---|---|
| Decade | 1880s–90s | 1910s–30s |
| Where painted | Outdoors, Scottish villages | Studio, France, Iona |
| Light | Cold, grey, northern | Hot, high, southern — or Hebridean |
| Palette | Muted greens, greys, earth | Saturated: pink, jade, black, white |
| Subject | Rural work, children, farms | Still life, interiors, shorelines |
| Brushwork | Square, blocky, from Bastien-Lepage | Flat planes and hard edges |
The one who is in both stories
John Lavery. He was a Glasgow Boy in his twenties — outdoor pictures, Scottish light, the whole argument — and by the 1910s he was a society portraitist in London painting Tangier and the Riviera in a manner that sits much closer to the Colourists. He is the bridge, and he is the reason the two groups blur in people's minds.
Which to hang
Glasgow Boys pictures are quieter and they reward a room you spend time in — a study, a dining room, a hallway you walk past ten times a day. Guthrie's field pictures in particular keep giving.
Colourist pictures are loud in the best way and they do the work from across a room. If a wall needs one thing to fix it, take a Cadell or a Peploe.
See the Glasgow Boys · See the Scottish Colourists — archival prints, framed or unframed, made to order and shipped free worldwide.